NO FILES. NO OBLIGATION.Step 1 of 3 · Your business

What does your company do?

Start with your business. We’ll ask for your email at the end.

YOUR INFORMATION

You choose what you share

Before any data sale

We agree what records may be included and how they may be used. Information you are not entitled to share must stay out. Removing names does not cancel confidentiality agreements or make every record safe to sell.

When you ask for an assessment

NextLevel Data Broker uses your company name, email and the business details you enter to review your enquiry and contact you about an assessment. Requests are stored securely on our server. They are not published on the website, and submitting does not sign you up for marketing.

Do not enter customer identities, bank details, passwords or confidential business information. This form does not ask you to upload files.

Website tools

This website uses no advertising trackers or marketing cookies. Fonts are served from our own server. The animation can be paused and respects your reduced-motion setting.

When the team contacts you, you can ask about your enquiry, corrections or deletion by replying to them. Continuing use of records already sold is governed by the separate data agreement. Full website privacy notice

Software product companies & startups

Your whole product history could earn income

From the first design to support tickets and churn experiments, your records show how real software products are built and grown. AI companies pay for exactly that.

See what you can share

No code to upload. No commitment to sell.

First sale of your records $50k–$500k
Then, from new records each year $25k–$250k and growing
Preliminary valuation within one week

Typical ranges, not a promise. The real amount depends on your records and the contract.

What you can share

Every part of building a product counts

Not just code. Buyers want to see how a product team thinks, decides and improves.

  • Product design

    Research, user interviews, mockups, specs and the changes made after feedback

    • Figma
    • Miro
    • Notion
  • Competitor research

    Analyses, feature comparisons and the positioning decisions that followed

    • Notion
    • Google Docs
    • Sheets
  • Product development

    Issues, pull requests, reviews, tests and releases, linked end to end

    • GitHub
    • GitLab
    • Jira
  • Roadmap

    Priorities, trade-offs, and what was cut and why

    • Productboard
    • Linear
    • Jira
  • Support & troubleshooting

    Tickets, diagnosis, the fix and the reply to the customer

    • Zendesk
    • Intercom
    • Email
  • Churn & engagement

    Metrics, experiments and what actually improved retention

    • Amplitude
    • Mixpanel
    • HubSpot
  • Marketing & customer comms

    Onboarding emails, release notes, campaigns and their results

    • Mailchimp
    • HubSpot
    • Intercom

What buyers pay for

One feature, followed across its whole life

Public code shows the final result. Buyers want the path that led there, across every tool.

  1. Research Customers asked for it; competitors compared
  2. Design Mockups, spec and feedback
  3. Build Issues, code, reviews, tests
  4. Launch Release notes and announcement
  5. Support Questions and fixes after launch
  6. Measure Did usage and retention improve?

What is worth most

Linked work with results beats volume

A guide to what buyers value, not a price list. Ownership, licences and secrets decide what can be offered.

  • Features followed from research to release, with results Highest
  • Issue → PR → merge, with a test that proves the fix Highest
  • Support tickets linked to the fix and the reply High
  • Growth experiments with before-and-after metrics High
  • Generated code, vendored libraries, version bumps Low
  • Forks of open-source projects Usually not yours to offer

Connected data

A few examples of connected data

Buyers want many kinds of linked records: any work that can be followed across your tools, from the first signal to a proven result.

A broken export. A tested fix

  1. Problem

    Customer reported that CSV exports dropped rows with non-ASCII names

    • Zendesk
    • Email
    • Jira
  2. Fix

    Encoding fix plus a failing test; reviewer asked to cover streaming too

    • GitHub
    • GitLab
  3. Proof

    Tests red → green, released, customer told

    • GitHub Actions
    • Zendesk

Trial users leaving. A better onboarding

  1. Problem

    New trial users dropped off in their first week

    • Amplitude
    • HubSpot
  2. Fix

    Interviews, a redesigned first-run flow, tested against the old one

    • Figma
    • Intercom
    • LaunchDarkly
  3. Proof

    More users finished setup and stayed

    • Amplitude
    • Mixpanel

A competitor move. A better answer

  1. Signal

    A competitor launched a feature customers kept asking about

    • Notion
    • Gong
    • Slack
  2. Decision

    Compared options, agreed a different approach, moved it up the roadmap

    • Productboard
    • Figma
    • Jira
  3. Result

    Shipped and announced; sales calls tracked the response

    • GitHub
    • Mailchimp
    • HubSpot
…and many more
  • Incident alert → investigation → post-mortem
  • Design file → spec → feature → release
  • Pricing test → plan change → revenue
  • Customer request → roadmap → shipped feature
  • Security report → patch → verification
  • Sales call → custom feature → renewal

What stays private

You decide what leaves the building

Secrets

Keys and tokens are scanned for across the whole history and removed

Customer data

Names, emails and account details are removed or replaced with fake values

Client-owned work

Stays out unless the client agrees

Third-party code

Checked against its licence and usually left out

Your people

Names are replaced with codes, and still treated as personal data

Roadmap and security

Leave out any product, folder or period; known open vulnerabilities stay out

Your records. Your choice. An AI check flags risks, people review them, and nothing is shared until you approve it.

How we protect your information

Two ways to earn

Sell your history once, then keep earning

Two separate offers. Choose one, both or neither.

Yearly income grows as you capture more First sale Yearly sales

Illustration, not a forecast. Yearly payments apply only if your contract says so.

Sell existing history
  • You keep your code, designs and rights
  • One contact per team, a few hours here and there
  • A written offer: fixed price, or paid after a later sale
How selling works
Earn from new records each year

We call this Data Farming: keeping better records of work you already do, so there is more to sell each year.

Small process changes, better-set-up tools or a few extra tools that capture more mean even more money every year

  • Small process changes, e.g. link every ticket, design, code change and release
  • Set up the tools you already use to keep more of the story
  • Add tools that capture more, free of charge if part of the agreed plan
  • No keystroke logging, nothing switched on without your approval
How Data Farming works

How it works

From first chat to offer

  1. 1

    Tell us about your product

    Which teams and tools you use, and what you own

  2. 2

    Preliminary valuation

    An estimate within one week, with nothing shared

  3. 3

    Scope and checks

    Secret, licence and privacy checks, with people reviewing the results

  4. 4

    Offer and your approval

    A written offer. Nothing leaves until you approve it

An honest check

Is this right for your company?

A good fit

  • You own your product and code
  • Several years of history
  • Work linked across tools (tickets, code, support)
  • Real tests and code reviews
  • Product, support and analytics records, not just code

Probably not yet

  • Most work belongs to clients who have not agreed
  • A very young product
  • Mostly forks of other projects
  • Nothing written down outside chat
Before you decide

Questions product teams ask

Does the code itself leave our control?

Only the repositories, time range and scope you approve. Delivery terms, permitted uses and any restrictions on redistribution are set in the agreement before anything is prepared.

We build software for clients. Can we include that work?

Only where your contracts give you the right to. Client-owned code is excluded unless the client agrees. We help map which repositories are yours to offer.

Could this expose our product roadmap or a competitive advantage?

You choose the scope, and we can exclude repositories, paths or periods. Removing names alone cannot prevent every possible disclosure, so we agree recipients and uses up front.

Our history contains secrets that leaked years ago. Does that rule us out?

Not necessarily. We scan the full history and remove what we find from the prepared output; you should rotate anything exposed. A repository that cannot be cleaned reliably may be left out.

Is open-source code inside our repositories a problem?

Third-party code is checked against its licence and is usually excluded. Your own code around it may still be in scope.

Can we include support, analytics and marketing records, not just code?

Yes. Those are often the most useful part, because they show why work was done and whether it helped. Customer names and contact details are removed first, and you approve the scope.

LET’S FIND OUT WHAT YOU HAVE

Find out what your product history could be worth

Preliminary valuation within one week.

No files to upload. No commitment to sell.